me.dm is part of the decentralized social network powered by Mastodon.
Ideas and information to deepen your understanding of the world. Run by the folks at Medium.

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.6K
active users

Learn more

Clarification: @KronoMoon / is not specifically about or . But it should be made clear — by researchers — that all / visitations could likely be .

Conversely, if arrive, during the or any other time, then expect them to be arriving in or .

We think are more probable than actual visitors. But let's find out.

[1/3] Watching the first hour of the new docuseries brings up basic () questions, not being answered.

Much of the story is about manufacturing doubt in / programs of the and other institutions, which it does rather convincingly. But the emphasis gradually veers more heavily into , , remote viewing and other non-UFO mysteries, which historically & secretly were also studied by those govs. The message suggests that the answers are already in us.

[2/3] It's not showing how remote viewing can explain . It's not showing remote viewing at all, so far.

Post , & thought require & other that extend our senses & capabilities — for example. These methods reach beyond our , & other limitations.

The show asks us to be of official agendas, but then clouds its own . It knows a few things, but does it reveal hard about ?

[3/3] Simply put, episode 1 of the new docuseries exposes secrecy, and worse carried out by regarding / sightings. Good work, so where do we go from here?

They seem to be suggesting that studies can answer questions. (OK, how? What has this actually taught us?)

Another approach would be to improve our studies of UAP / UFOs. Build on what's already been developed, increasing & involvement.

@KronoMoon

I have embarked on the #disclosure journey many decades ago.

My initial goal was to learn about the nuts and bolts of the #phenomenon

But as more (dis)information came to hand, it is evident that the phenomenon is an eye opener onto the true nature of the universe.
Some of the 6 observables hint at multidimensional mastery of advanced physics...

According to the very latest theorems on quantum mechanics, multiverse where times arrow is reversed are plausible. So time travel, may be as "simple" as shifting into a dimension where times arrow is reversed to yours, go relativistic, then pop back in.

Action that would be trivial if you have nearly unlimited power and understanding of physics as much as 300,000 years in advance to ours.

@n_dimension
Can we look up the 6 observables?

@KronoMoon

The 6 #uap observables, as defined by Lou Elizondo.
For the #OOTL folk:
Lou is a former director of the Pentagon Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP).
A US military #UFO office.

1) Flight without visible engines or control or lift surfaces.

2) Sudden and instant acceleration
(and stopping)
(As high as 150+ g).
One physicist in the SOL conference presentation calculated that one of the UAPs (observed by the entire deck crew of a US naval vessel) instantly stopped a rapid descent over the surface of the ocean and ate the energy release equivalent to 150 tomahawk missile warheads exploding.

3) Flight without signature (sonic boom, contrail, water wake)

4) Low observability or cloaking, witnesses sometimes see "shimmer", "haze" or "shield" around the vehicle.
Vehicles sometimes disappear altogether.

5) Trans-medium travel.
Vehicles are observed traveling at speed through air and water interface (and air/space).
This observable is actually embedded in the pentagon AARO (All-Domain 'Resolution' Office) name.
(AARO.mil).
The current incarnation of many of the US military "nothing to see here" PR disasters.

6) Biological effects. Close proximity to the vehicles has caused personnel damage from rash/burn to brain damage.

A UAP is not considered to be classified as such, unless it meets at least one criterion.